As we glance at the calendar, it’s clear that the holiday season is upon us. In the golf industry, this time of year also signals the start of the product release season, during which nearly every company introduces its new product lines for the upcoming year. In the story “The Polar Express,” Santa Claus famously holds up a bell from one of his reindeer and declares it the first gift of Christmas. While Srixon may not be taking on the role of Santa Claus, they are indeed giving us the first gift of release season with the unveiling of their new ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons.
With the ZXiR irons, Srixon is introducing a new addition to the game-improvement market, and for the first time, an iron set that firmly sits in the super game-improvement category with the ZXiR HL.
Material Change: Introducing i-ALLOY
2025 was a significant year for Srixon in terms of materials. Through their new impact forging, or i-FORGED, process, they were able to utilize new materials that not only made the ZXi irons stronger but also softer. It’s no small feat, and throughout the lineup, the combinations of materials have been adjusted to help deliver ultimate performance.
In case you missed it earlier in the year, THP provided a more in-depth look at what Srixon’s i-FORGED material change was all about. Do yourself a favor and give it a read here for some behind-the-scenes insights on their journey to a better feel.

Srixon is at it again with the new ZXiR irons by developing a new material known as i-ALLOY. Moving to i-ALLOY has provided several benefits for the ZXiR irons. For starters, it’s 10% softer than 431 steel, which helps deliver better feedback, muted vibrations, and provides a softer and smoother feel than other game improvement irons.
I-ALLOY also allowed them to make some changes to their Mainframe design. Mainframe allows Srixon to save weight and boost MOI through a combination of milled channels on the back side of every iron face. At impact, these channels and grooves react in a way that increases ball speed, resulting in greater distance and forgiveness. On the ZXiR irons, Srixon took advantage of machine learning to see where most mid to high handicap golfers make contact. To little surprise, the results were that these golfers tend to miss low on the face. Therefore, the Mainframe pattern, which is unique on each iron face, has been altered in a way that effectively lowers the sweet spot so that golfers will get more performance out of those lower strikes.
Key Technologies in the Srixon ZXiR and ZXiR HL

ZXiR irons don’t stop with Mainframe as they also carry over other familiar pieces of tech that Srixon is known for, including the Tour V.T. Sole. Srixon’s V.T. Sole design features a higher bounce on the front edge of the sole, which helps prevent the club from digging. Meanwhile, the trailing edge provides relief, allowing the club head to quickly exit the turf without losing speed. Whenever the conversation turns to Srixon’s sole design, I feel like a broken record because it’s one of the best sole designs on the market for smoother turf interaction.

Other key design features shared with the ZXi family include progressive grooves that offer wider spacing on the long irons for better distance and tighter grooves on the scoring clubs for improved control and spin. Srixon utilizes their laser face milling patterns between these grooves, which also enhances spin on every shot.
“With the introduction of our new game improvement irons, and for the first time ever, a super game improvement model, Srixon is opening the door for more golfers to experience the performance and feel our irons are celebrated for. These additions represent a new chapter in our innovation journey, bringing the advanced technologies and premium craftsmanship players expect from Srixon and making them available to all levels of players.”
Jeff Brunski, Vice President of Research & Development.
The Srixon ZXi Family Lineup
When the ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons hit the market in January, Srixon’s ZXi family will feature an incredibly deep roster that covers roughly 99% of the golfers out there. Better players have the Zxi7, which offers the best feel and smallest profile of the family. The ZXi5 irons cater to the players’ distance category for golfers seeking the ultimate blend of size, feel, and performance, while the ZXi4 is classified by Srixon as a “Players Development Iron,” generating incredible ball speeds and forgiveness due to its hollow body design. ZXiR and ZXiR HL will comfortably slot behind those as the more forgiving options in the lineup.

Srixon has consistently demonstrated the crossover appeal across their product lines. Just because a golfer has a specific handicap doesn’t mean they can’t benefit from a more forgiving club, and vice versa. Srixon proudly allows golfers to order combo sets of irons, enabling them to select clubs from multiple sets to create a personalized iron set that works seamlessly throughout their bag. One of the reasons Srixon can blend sets together so effortlessly is due to their ability to create a cohesive look that flows from one set to another, and they have once again achieved that unified appearance.


Srixon ZXiR and ZXiR HL Design Differences
Compared to other members of the ZXi iron family, the ZXiR irons showcase characteristics typical of game improvement irons. They feature a longer blade, wider soles, and increased offset, all of which are designed to assist mid to high-handicap players. Both the ZXiR and ZXiR HL models incorporate a cavity design consistent with Srixon’s other irons. In terms of the topline, the ZXiR maintains a thickness of 6.0 mm, which is the same as that of the ZXi7, ZXi5, and ZXi4 models. However, the HL version differs slightly, with a topline measuring 6.5 mm.
The stock shafts available for the ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons include KBS Tour Lite and KBS 80 HL. Meanwhile, KBS PGI 80(stiff)/60 (regular) and KBS Max 55 (regular)/50 (senior) will be the off-the-shelf options for those who prefer graphite. As usual, Srixon offers a comprehensive catalog of custom shafts, which includes many options at no additional charge.
Who are these irons for?
- ZXiR fits mid-handicaps who want distance, forgiveness, and a clean aesthetic without veering into overly bulky territory.
- ZXiR HL fits newer golfers, slower-swinging players, seniors, or anyone who needs help launching the ball and maintaining carry distance across the set.
Srixon ZXiR and ZXiR HL Details
Srixon’s new ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons will be available for fittings and pre-orders starting on December 4th. For those who prefer to wait until they are available in stores, that will happen on January 6th.
Pricing
$1,099 for a 7-piece steel set and $1,199 for a 7-piece graphite set.
More information on the new ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons can be found at us.dunlopsports.com/srixon.





They are hot. So much so, that I went to an empty sim room to hit a few in there (it was late and the place was empty). I thought there might have been an issue with the sim in my room with some of the numbers I was seeing.
Questions for those that have hit the ZXiR’s &/or mainly the shafts…..
I’ve already decided on the ZXiR HL for the SRIXON Experience. But the shaft is the question….
Currently play the C-Taper Lite 105 Regular Soft stepped 1x. This is a fairly stout shaft in its weight class but keeps my swing consistent. My Swing Error is getting short in the back swing and quick in transition. From my data a heavier shaft with stiff butt end and low torque tends to help my misses and stay the most consistent.
[I][U]THE CONTENDERS[/U][/I]
[B]MMT 105g Stiff[/B]
-Same weight but overall the shaft is more flexible/more torque.
-Can get this shaft in the Utility & Hybrid
-Has proven to be a decent shaft in a current hybrid I have
[B]KBS TGI 95g S++[/B]
-EI profiles/torque match the C-Taper Lite but 10g lighter
-On the edge of my weight limit for feel
-Possible hard step 1x to stiffen the butt/handle up as the tip is already softer than the C-Taper Lite
[QUOTE=”Tywithay, post: 13833337, member: 14378″]
The only thing that scares me there is the 30 yard front to back difference. Potential distance is amazing, but it’s hard to put a confident swing on the ball if you don’t know if you’re going to be front of the green or 10 yards over the back.
Definitely seems like you’re on to something though. The efficiency is wild. Some of those would be good driver numbers.
[/QUOTE]
I know. I get it. I feel ya, but holy upside…
I just don’t want this to be the Callaway Paradym. That’s probably a low blow and I might get beat up for that reference, but I feel like that time era golf manufactures CHASED distance and it made for some really hot but inconsistent front to back dispersion. Hit 3 shots at 170 and then all of sudden I’d get a 195 and be like wtf?
I will say the thing I love about this is it’s forcing me the other direction. Ego gets involved and we as golfers always try to push towards the more “tour-like” club. I just went from 105 graphite in Hot Metals (Mizuno’s Game Improvement) to 90g Hot Metal Pros (Gamer Distance Category) and now i’m testing 80g in GI, and GI High Launches.
And I will tell you right now, there was not a single thing in feel i was missing. These feel great off the face. And my dispersion has definitely got worse moving from 105 HM to 90 HMP so I’m not sad about going back to GI if I can keep similar numbers and so far I’m seeing numbers that are actually better than my gamers from top to bottom depending on the shaft/head setup.
[QUOTE=”JAyer38, post: 13833423, member: 85336″]
Questions for those that have hit the ZXiR’s &/or mainly the shafts…..
I’ve already decided on the ZXiR HL for the SRIXON Experience. But the shaft is the question….
Currently play the C-Taper Lite 105 Regular Soft stepped 1x. This is a fairly stout shaft in its weight class but keeps my swing consistent. My Swing Error is getting short in the back swing and quick in transition. From my data a heavier shaft with stiff butt end and low torque tends to help my misses and stay the most consistent.
[I][U]THE CONTENDERS[/U][/I]
[B]MMT 105g Stiff[/B]
-Same weight but overall the shaft is more flexible/more torque.
-Can get this shaft in the Utility & Hybrid
-Has proven to be a decent shaft in a current hybrid I have
[B]KBS TGI 95g S++[/B]
-EI profiles/torque match the C-Taper Lite but 10g lighter
-On the edge of my weight limit for feel
-Possible hard step 1x to stiffen the butt/handle up as the tip is already softer than the C-Taper Lite
[/QUOTE]
Do you think you are more impacted by weight or flex?
[QUOTE=”JAyer38, post: 13833423, member: 85336″]
Questions for those that have hit the ZXiR’s &/or mainly the shafts…..
I’ve already decided on the ZXiR HL for the SRIXON Experience. But the shaft is the question….
Currently play the C-Taper Lite 105 Regular Soft stepped 1x. This is a fairly stout shaft in its weight class but keeps my swing consistent. My Swing Error is getting short in the back swing and quick in transition. From my data a heavier shaft with stiff butt end and low torque tends to help my misses and stay the most consistent.
[I][U]THE CONTENDERS[/U][/I]
[B]MMT 105g Stiff[/B]
-Same weight but overall the shaft is more flexible/more torque.
-Can get this shaft in the Utility & Hybrid
-Has proven to be a decent shaft in a current hybrid I have
[B]KBS TGI 95g S++[/B]
-EI profiles/torque match the C-Taper Lite but 10g lighter
-On the edge of my weight limit for feel
-Possible hard step 1x to stiffen the butt/handle up as the tip is already softer than the C-Taper Lite
[/QUOTE]
Well I can help here one both of these I think.
I would be SHOCKED if you swung a MMT 105g and thought to yourself wow that’s alot more flexible or whippy than my C Taper. It’s been a while since I’ve been in Steel, but every time I swing a 105 MMT I feel like I’m swinging a piece of rebar. They are very stout from my perspective.
They only had the TGI up to 80g yesterday, but I would say that alot more Steelfiber feeling than I thought it would be, so it’s still definitely a stouter shaft. It’s less stout and less muted in my opinion than the MMT though.
So many people are tending towards lighter weights these days…vs. higher, so I kind of like the KBS TGI 95g for you, but I know nothing about your data.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13833482, member: 62865″]
Do you think you are more impacted by weight or flex?
[/QUOTE]
Weight has always been a bigger factor than flex for me. I can/have hit a 60g-78g driver shatfs WAY more consistent & better than 50g & below. This also went the same with irons shafts, 85g was either the perfect or I had no clue what happened being it was 4″ behind the ball or in front of it.
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13833484, member: 53564″]
Well I can help here one both of these I think.
I would be SHOCKED if you swung a MMT 105g and thought to yourself wow that’s alot more flexible or whippy than my C Taper. It’s been a while since I’ve been in Steel, but every time I swing a 105 MMT I feel like I’m swinging a piece of rebar. They are very stout from my perspective.
They only had the TGI up to 80g yesterday, but I would say that alot more Steelfiber feeling than I thought it would be, so it’s still definitely a stouter shaft. It’s less stout and less muted in my opinion than the MMT though.
So many people are tending towards lighter weights these days…vs. higher, so I kind of like the KBS TGI 95g for you, but I know nothing about your data.
[/QUOTE]
I can honestly say my MMT 80g-S in my hybrid & my KBS PGI 85g-S play very similar feel which to me has the feel of a kick near the mid-tip. I tried a Steelfiber i95-R and honestly was not happy with the feel but really enjoyed the i110 & the i115fc. But neither are as stout as my C-Taper Lites which to me play very linear in feel. Now all of this is also my feel.
[QUOTE=”JAyer38, post: 13833727, member: 85336″]
[I][B]Weight has always been a bigger factor than flex for me. [/B][/I]I can/have hit a 60g-78g driver shatfs WAY more consistent & better than 50g & below. This also went the same with irons shafts, 85g was either the perfect or I had no clue what happened being it was 4″ behind the ball or in front of it.
I can honestly say my MMT 80g-S in my hybrid & my KBS PGI 85g-S play very similar feel which to me has the feel of a kick near the mid-tip. I tried a Steelfiber i95-R and honestly was not happy with the feel but really enjoyed the i110 & the i115fc. But neither are as stout as my C-Taper Lites which to me play very linear in feel. Now all of this is also my feel.
[/QUOTE]
Hearing you say this I would say go with the weight fit option, personally.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13833812, member: 62865″]
Hearing you say this I would say go with the weight fit option, personally.
[/QUOTE]
Going to do my best to hit them before deciding but of course work is busy right now so no time haha. I do play a KBS PGI 85g-stiff in my Utility 5i and it has been a great club since it entered the bag. But I do find myself struggling to feel the clubhead and shut the face with it more than my set irons with the C-Tapers Lites.
ALLL the options and choosing haha
Another interesting part about the HL vs Regular debate is what it does to the gapping at the top and bottom of the bag.
It’s subtle, but also these bags are quite different and I will say I like the gapping and club selections in that HL bag FAR more than i do that Regular bag. I could careless about having that 13* 3w and I like the wedge gapping so much better even if i just stayed at 50-54-58, vs the 6 degree gap at regular.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410278[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834028, member: 53564″]
Another interesting part about the HL vs Regular debate is what it does to the gapping at the top and bottom of the bag.
It’s subtle, but also these bags are quite different and I will say I like the gapping and club selections in that HL bag FAR more than i do that Regular bag. I could careless about having that 13* 3w and I like the wedge gapping so much better even if i just stayed at 50-54-58, vs the 6 degree gap at regular.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1770228188926.png”]9410278[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
So the plan was to wait to see how you all and others get on with irons but the more I follow your journey, the more I simply want to buy some HL myself just to see what’s what
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13834044, member: 62865″]
So the plan was to wait to see how you all and others get on with irons but the more I follow your journey, the more I simply want to buy some HL myself just to see what’s what
[/QUOTE]
I take it you like the gap chart on the right better too?
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834028, member: 53564″]
Another interesting part about the HL vs Regular debate is what it does to the gapping at the top and bottom of the bag.
It’s subtle, but also these bags are quite different and I will say I like the gapping and club selections in that HL bag FAR more than i do that Regular bag. I could careless about having that 13* 3w and I like the wedge gapping so much better even if i just stayed at 50-54-58, vs the 6 degree gap at regular.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1770228188926.png”]9410278[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Only thing that matters is you know how far each club carries and it’s to your liking 🙂
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834082, member: 53564″]
I take it you like the gap chart on the right better too?
[/QUOTE]
I do. And a lot of it comes down to how I play as a golfer who has to fight and claw to get under a 10 handicap. I have enough distance that the long game isn’t critical, but also not skilled enough to be super consistent much outside of 175 yds. I’d rather have to manufacture less and have more options lower in the bag.
Yea and I feel like every time we talk, i think to myself that sounds exactly like me.
I can push a ball 260+ down a fairway if I'm on.
I'm not awful inside 150 or so.
I think I chip and putt at least on par if not better than a high single digit handicap.
It's penalties off of the tee for me, crappy drives that leave a LONG shot in, which is precisely that mark you're talking about 170+ yards.
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834163, member: 53564″]
Yea and I feel like every time we talk, i think to myself that sounds exactly like me.
I can push a ball 260+ down a fairway if I’m on.
I’m not awful inside 150 or so.
I think I chip and putt at least on par if not better than a high single digit handicap.
It’s penalties off of the tee for me, crappy drives that leave a LONG shot in, which is precisely that mark you’re talking about 170+ yards.
[/QUOTE]
Oh man I can relate.
Except my approach is my worst part of my game. :ROFLMAO: that’s why I’m like a 14 atm.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13834152, member: 62865″]
I do. And a lot of it comes down to how I play as a golfer who has to fight and claw to get under a 10 handicap. I have enough distance that the long game isn’t critical, but also not skilled enough to be super consistent much outside of 175 yds. I’d rather have to manufacture less and have more options lower in the bag.
[/QUOTE]
That’s where my struggle is right now with how much I will like these long term.
Nuking a 7 iron 175 isn’t nearly as important as being really accurate from 75-160.
I need to land on something at the top end of the bag. Have the Vokey fitting session as part of WWGC 25 last week. I need to match to the bottom of the bag I’ll use this year….which could be a 15 yard difference based on set.
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834163, member: 53564″]
Yea and I feel like every time we talk, i think to myself that sounds exactly like me.
I can push a ball 260+ down a fairway if I’m on.
I’m not awful inside 150 or so.
I think I chip and putt at least on par if not better than a high single digit handicap.
It’s penalties off of the tee for me, crappy drives that leave a LONG shot in, which is precisely that mark you’re talking about 170+ yards.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that’s my head to. Even when I hit that poor drive, my expectation relative to my skill is to simply it get up near-ish the green, say inside 20 yards. So I am not overly concerned with gapping at those distance.
But to [USER=51648]@mantan[/USER]’s point, I want to be good inside 150 or so. And for me, I am thinking that means descent angle to stop where it lands.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13834044, member: 62865″]
So the plan was to wait to see how you all and others get on with irons but the more I follow your journey, the more I simply want to buy some HL myself just to see what’s what
[/QUOTE]
I’ve been thinking to myself today, “what if I went 1 strong, or even 2 strong, on the HL?” Add a little distance, still have some extra launch. I don’t hate a little lower bounce since I play on firm conditions most of the year. :unsure:
I’m over here building bags like…
[IMG alt=”Employee Of The Month Ugh GIF by Laff”]https://media1.giphy.com/media/jyzIDWTjgOyFcS6pa8/200.gif[/IMG]
This thread is peak THP. :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”V14_Heels, post: 13834028, member: 53564″]
Another interesting part about the HL vs Regular debate is what it does to the gapping at the top and bottom of the bag.
It’s subtle, but also these bags are quite different and I will say I like the gapping and club selections in that HL bag FAR more than i do that Regular bag. I could careless about having that 13* 3w and I like the wedge gapping so much better even if i just stayed at 50-54-58, vs the 6 degree gap at regular.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1770228188926.png”]9410278[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Those HL are perfect gapping! Im glad they line up with my current irons so well
My biggest concern was the 4H area… Some people said the 5H gaps better
We interrupt this program for….PHOTOS. Fresh out of the box, just delivered.
AW and 6i:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410305[/ATTACH]
AW:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410306[/ATTACH]
6i:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410307[/ATTACH]
6i Topline:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410308[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13834500, member: 3386″]
We interrupt this program for….PHOTOS. Fresh out of the box, just delivered.
AW and 6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7400.jpeg”]9410305[/ATTACH]
AW:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403.jpeg”]9410306[/ATTACH]
6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403 2.jpeg”]9410307[/ATTACH]
6i Topline:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7401.jpeg”]9410308[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Can’t wait to hear how you enjoy playing these.
Address look for AW – Callaway Ai Smoke HL vs Srixon ZXiR HL:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410312[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13834500, member: 3386″]
We interrupt this program for….PHOTOS. Fresh out of the box, just delivered.
AW and 6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7400.jpeg”]9410305[/ATTACH]
AW:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403.jpeg”]9410306[/ATTACH]
6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403 2.jpeg”]9410307[/ATTACH]
6i Topline:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7401.jpeg”]9410308[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Those look great. Don’t hate looking down at it either.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13834500, member: 3386″]
We interrupt this program for….PHOTOS. Fresh out of the box, just delivered.
AW and 6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7400.jpeg”]9410305[/ATTACH]
AW:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403.jpeg”]9410306[/ATTACH]
6i:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7403 2.jpeg”]9410307[/ATTACH]
6i Topline:
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_7401.jpeg”]9410308[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
hello there.
[QUOTE=”Tywithay, post: 13834265, member: 14378″]
I’ve been thinking to myself today, “what if I went 1 strong, or even 2 strong, on the HL?” Add a little distance, still have some extra launch. I don’t hate a little lower bounce since I play on firm conditions most of the year. :unsure:
I’m over here building bags like…
[IMG alt=”Employee Of The Month Ugh GIF by Laff”]https://media1.giphy.com/media/jyzIDWTjgOyFcS6pa8/200.gif[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
Damn…i didn’t even consider this. I’d want to go the other way though. Weaken the regulars to keep the little tighter blade length, get rid of the extra offset and add the bounce as I’m softer more often than firmer I’d say. Or at least I think i want more bounce with softer conditions…
II think this middle column is money…
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410352[/ATTACH]
-If I bend the regular weaker I get my height and descent angle, but keep a little bit of that distance especially in the mid irons.
-I reduce the offset which should help the left miss that I actually had the TGI 80 setup which also gave me the best dispersion
-More bounce is the only wildcard. I’m a sweeper, but ultimately I definitely play softer conditions, so this is always a tough one for me to decide one. Do you play the conditions or do you play your swing?
Thoughts after a quick session off grass after work between the MKii ZX5s and the ZXIR….
The difference in sound/feel was more apparent outside. The ZXIRs have a more prominent ‘clack’ at impact. It’s not bad…just more noticable outside. The difference in feel between the two was more apparent.
The short irons of the ZXIR were a joy to hit. The 7-iron, even 1* weak had some low missles. I need more time with them but I just don’t have the confidence that I have with the MKii ZX5s.
If you’re on the fence, seriously consider the HL model….
I took the ZXiR HL 6i, PW and AW to the range today (still waiting for the other 3 to arrive – I ordered them separately).
Started off in our short game practice area – it’s a series of flagsticks stuck in big plastic buckets buried in the ground, with closely mown areas resembling fairways and short to medium rough. You can hit anything from short chips to about 80 yard partial shots, from just about any lie angle you can imagine:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410498[/ATTACH]
After playing around there for a bit, I headed to the driving range for full swings. Our range is usually mats, but fortunately today was a grass day so I was able to hit them off actual grass.
Turf interaction with the V.T. soles is really nice. I’ve always wondered if these soles worked as good as they looked, and they didn’t disappoint. Even on slightly fat shots they still cut through and glide out smoothly.
The I-Alloy heads feel good. You can feel the difference when you don’t hit the sweet spot, but it’s not unpleasant or jarring – you just know you missed.
These irons fly high, and the descent angle is awesome. If you’re already a high ball hitter with your irons, these might be too much for you. I’m not a high ball hitter, I can use the help getting the ball in the air, and the HLs definitely do that. Try before you buy if hitting your irons too high could be a worry for you.
This is the 6i at address behind a ball:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410499[/ATTACH]
The PW at address:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410500[/ATTACH]
And the AW at address:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9410501[/ATTACH]
Got to test these tonight with a preferred shaft. The rep was having a little trouble with the trackman so hard to draw any firm performance data. That said, in terms of feel and presentation I could absolutely play these irons. They felt great for their class and were not overly large down by the ball in my opinion.